Congress should be listening and learning; above all, working!

Congress should be listening and learning; above all, working!

Tonight’s writing is one of these, ‘she-at’, how much more do I want to take? For the first episode

how could anyone in their right mind even remotely support of changing the USA’s Constitutional government? There are men, women, and even children espousing “let’s move toward or change our government to socialism.” If there is one thing I am certain of that must be that simply these people do not know what they are saying, in the true Marxian vernacular.

In the true Marxian fashion according to socialism, just as he said as his last words from the hospital bed, he said to Mr. Engle’s, “it still will not ever work.” Then he died. Alright, I for one, can see and handle that notion from whatever direction it’s coming from…just as long as those who are spilling this rubbish realize that they are espousing errors AND trying to form a conglomerate government that is further from socialism than it is from capitalism.

Another episode that is confounding up the works is that it is the very same people who are espousing this nonsensical rubbish who are grabbing the very best traits of capitalism, pardon me, but these folks are coming from the best universities and state schools and are ostensibly suffering from the lack of the American Dream, gripping about student loans, and going, with their wealth of stupidity to play in mom and dad’s house.

Yet the irony I have difficulty with is in the notion that these “little ones” were the spoiled ones and always got what they wanted. Do you think it will be that way as a socialist?

Okay then, let’s re-think and re-design and rename “socialism.” Let’s even put some capitalism in like the Fins, Swede’s and other Scandinavian nations did. You see, socialism will not work with democratic principles. So, for these nations to live as authoritarian or totalitarian governments where one person has all the power why not just add on some democratic principles?

 

Earlier today while listening to the news, a conglomerate of professionals were the judges. Questions such as healthcare, legalese, doctor’s fees, and medical payments, insurance minded people, economists, literally all the experts of their fields came to the conclusion that Americans would have to triple their now taxes on every good they enjoyed, to afford a government-owned and operated healthcare system; actually all of the experts agreed that the new form (after collecting the money from working and nonworking Americans) would be entirely like the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare.

Now, my first preemption. What would happen if the case of a strike? Or dare I say the workability numbers of the previous administrations? I do hope that you realize that in Canada, Australia, Scandinavia, many African and most European nations that the funds for healthcare come directly out of your own paycheck. Okay, preemption again. When one is paying healthcare for their entire family –let’s make this easy and simple – Mom, Dad, Brother and/or Sister’s healthcare costs, albeit used or unused still comes out of whomever’ s paycheck. Better hope that someone doesn’t need to use it; simply because it is going to cost more than your families made.

And of course, let’s not forget that almost all means of production, that is, companies that make money or not, are owned by the government. Yep, Qantas Airlines, Air Canada, and Aeroflot (Russian), Egyptian, Iranian, Vietnamese, Chinese, Venezuelan Air, and all of Air Africa are owned by their respective governments.

Finally, my hope beyond hope is that you go and live in the socialist nation before you even open your mouth again – you, and those of you who wanted to amend the free speech amendment.

C’MON AMERICA, STEP BY STEP, LET’S LEARN TO WALK AGAIN...

C’MON AMERICA, STEP BY STEP, LET’S LEARN TO WALK AGAIN...

Let’s look and evaluate the moronic things that have gone on in our “distinguished media” as fueled by the lying, deceitful, and aberrant matters as they were brought forward by the Barack Obama administration for well over eight years; however, that would take our nation’s explosive ordnance referred to as mushroom clouds.

As one clearly looks and examines the evidence as documented in a slew of best-selling books, including evidence against Hillary Clinton, James B. Comey, Loretta Lynch, and a group of people at the DNC; furthermore, let’s have a look at the intelligence community at the time the dossier’s, media reporting, and especially Mr.’s Clapper, Mueller, and many other prominent (?) intelligence people were directly involved in producing the Dossier against President Donald Trump.

When I was a boy, I loathed the Green Bay Packers! Why? Because they were winners. Although they suck now and as far back as at least one generation ago, they were indeed America’s Team way before the Cowboys were. So, let’s look at this America loves winners.

You name them, I’ll just put a comment or two – maybe.  Why is Meryl Streep added to everyone’s acceptance speech by women? Because she’s a great actor or because she owns three OSCAR’s? Same for Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, Denzel Washington, Sally Fields, as well as ethnic and racial lines. So why doesn’t anyone gripe about racial profiling? Because they are not winning of late

.

Now, just today, I found myself singing “Only in Chicago could that happen.” Of course, I’m talkingwhite men beat him up when the truth already acknowledges that it was two Nigerian black men who allegedly beat him and shouted racial slurs against him. All the while Mr. Smollett not only knew of this lousy screenplay but actually paid the two men to beat him up, splash a little bleach on his neck and wrote him this childlike letter with color, cut letters, and some handwriting to boot! The Chicago Police department already hauled the two Nigerian black men within one day from Nigeria to Chicago and they spilled the beans, even how much their whatever paid, to beat him up.

about the ploy, plot, gamer scheme behind the antics of Jussie Smollett. Heck, it’s okay....why even charge him with 16 counts of lying, saying two

Yep, “Only in Chicago could that happen, the same Chicago that produced Barack Obama. Yet, what is all of this rubbish we hear about America loves winners? So, you’re still rooting for the Patriots? Right! What it is that angers me more than anything written here, although it has been fun – why are the Democrats cutting and hedging the story against Trump? There have been other times in US history when the person who captured the popular vote and lost an election!

Think maybe we should ask the Ruskin's did they fix the vote for Hillary? People, I am trying to paint in very broad strokes why President Trump should be treated fairly. Just compare the campaign pledges.

And, just one more thing: What and why has happened to the sovereign American rights and liberties? What’s with the illegals even being able to file for asylum? These are in all right, title, and interest embarrassing to the USA! Let’s see here, how many of you have forgotten about the plutonium that went missing when Hillary was in Russia? What did she, through her cohorts do to Libya?

We have some real problems in this place we call a country; for some reason women did like the way men treated them vis-a-vie cussing, buying them drinks, or even open a door for them. For some confounded reason, men got blamed for that – liberated women! Where is our MeTooMovement? When heads finally come out of men’s backsides and we start telling our sexual harassment stories to the world – no matter how many years later – maybe I’ll get mine.

The Birthright Citizenship Act

Some Members of Congress have introduced bills to eliminate birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally or on temporary visas. The “Birthright Citizenship Act” (HR 1868), introduced by Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) has 91 cosponsors. A bill by Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-CA) would restrict birthright citizenship to the children “of a mother who is a citizen or legal permanent resident of the United States.”

Just about everyone who has read the Fourteenth Amendment can clearly see the politicking and potential corruption that could easily be caused by the amendments wording. Yet, we believe one still should see the entirety of the situation at the time of its writing to fully understand how Congressional elected officials could present and rush through a piece of legislation that in all seriousness – no one could be proud of authoring.

As most will admit the U.S. Constitution is more of how the federal government is supposed to limit itself, while producing guidelines on how to ensure safety, protection, laws, courts, and separation of powers within that government. The Constitution is a brilliant document that took a lot of men (and their women) years to produce; however, it was never intended to be scripture or Bible, Torah, or Qur'an like.

So many people revere the Constitution as if it were a holy book or artifact, when in reality it is not. There are clearly some needed changes; however, to get any Congress to do such is out-of-bounds or even reasonable. As we look deeply at the Fourteenth Amendment, hopefully it will become obvious just where changes are needed and why. Therefore, let’s look at some of the issues that the Thirty-ninth Congress had to address much sooner than later.

Of course the matter of Dred Scott v. Sanford needed to be cleaned up before anything else could reasonable get done. In 1857 the Supreme Court had ruled that no black of African descent (even a freed black) could be a citizen of the United States. Furthermore, even prior to the1860s blacks were counted as 3/5ths of a person.

Therefore the Fourteenth Amendment was necessary to over-turn Dred Scott and to settle the question of the citizenship of the newly freed slaves. Now imagine that – need some changes to an unethical law that is antiquated? Congress immediately went to work on it. It must be clearly noted that this was during the Reconstruction Era and the Congress had an enormous amount of matters to settle – especially since the nation had been broken into two parts with separate ideologies on how things were to be managed.

There is a cliché that states: “To the victors go the spoils…” ostensibly meaning if you’ve gone to war and won then you are entitled to take or gather what you want. This was not the case with the United States “Union” government; however, no mistake should be made – over 600,000 men, women, and children died as a direct cause of this war and of course the North wanted some reparations from the South.

If possible think of two separate nations deluxe with governments, legislatures, judiciary, even money designed in your country’s standards. As in all wars the winning side does not want their former enemies to rebuild – especially its war making equipment. Furthermore, think of the South as the agrarian labor intensive providers of the entire nation, who had racked up enormous war debts that they couldn’t pay and for having hundreds of thousands of slaves that instead of being paid for were able to go free. The South had suffered incalculable losses.

The North was bent on what all victors nearly die for – the admission that they had won the war. Moreover, the North wanted various and sundry punishments for those who had left the Union on the State level, Confederate level, including the Confederate president, generals, and other high-ranking men of war.

However, citizenship loomed over those who fought and were not free; Dred Scott needed overturning, and the Fourteenth Amendment needed to be cleared for the forthcoming Civil Rights Act of 1866. (End Part 2)