What will they try next?

The House Oversight Committee...?

Just a thought with some reason to explain why – Why are the Democrats trying to gain recent points in the courthouses? Having an already confessed felon appear before a highly esteemed body of people suffering from “Politician-itis” and literally having his way, with his mouth conjuring up as many hateful nuances against one man that has proven to be void of fruition, in my mind's eye, makes the organizers of this event ridiculous. Of course, I speak of President Trump’s former attorney, Mr. Michael Cohen.

Here is a thought – Is there anyone out there reading or otherwise that are feeling, “Hmm, maybe we’ve got the wrong scenario, why don’t we blow the peoples' mind’s and say something good and favorable about OUR president?

Here is the disaster that you will have to overcome: Why do you feel compelled to dehumanize President Trump and continue to manipulate the media?

This very characteristic, dehumanizing our nations President, is not a good political agenda. As I sit and write, I am still wondering if anything at all will become of this strategy, other than the Democrat Party showing its full colors and just being mean to others.

The rubbish (supported by H. Clinton and others) of doing away with the Electoral College is a myth! Anyone who has studied at a reasonable rate of high school political science knows better. So, what about you? Ostensibly, I see you driving people away from your party. 

Shall we look at the travesty?

The border protection wall. I refer to it in that way is because I would hope that at that border, this protective wall will keep sex-trafficking, drug-laden humans or animals, or even vehicles tunneling their ways into our country. However, rather than to “try” and make Mr. Trump look and or appear as though he is looking for more money – admit it, you’ve promised him and other administrations a lot more money.

I cannot speak for you so this one will be solely for me. Has anyone, preferably members of the Democratic Party, taken a moment and stopped to see what your party is doing? How much better would it look and be received if you took some time to say something about President Trump’s meaningful successes?

Please, just take a look at the black worker rate? Now let’s accompany all that record-setting data and add the woman’s and the entire labor force combined? Our economy is doing fabulous. Why not make it better?

Although President Trump was doing business with the leaders of North Korea, China, and Vietnam why should we expect a reasonable media outfit to cover it? It is still very real to me that Democrat’s are still trying to bury this man than even to applaud his efforts.

This, Just a Thought, writing looks to cover a conservatives person’s feelings with answers. Still very upset that a “Special Council” is and has been appointed to investigate an issue they have already admitting to President Trump has been exonerated from.

If it is that you do not like someone...get over it!

   This is the kind of mood I find myself in during the first opening of Education, Immigration, and Pop Culture today. It has become so overwhelmingly noticeable to me since the beginning of the first day of his administration Ah, hell! It has been since he registered his name for the office of the President of the United States. Fitting in with the title, haven't you ever worked for someone you didn't care for at all? Now surely, we've all worked with people that we did not much care about. But what can we do about it?.

Here is a secret between you and me, okay? I thought and felt hourly that Barack H.Obama was the absolute poorest excuse for a "President" I'd ever even heard of. Seriously, for the record, he was an on-time senator, learned his politics at Occidental University in L.A. under the tutelage of his grandparents who were card-carrying members of the Socialist Party of America. I am not going to fiddle my way through his trash, but with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and the total of the Chicago mob helping one out well...

 Straighten up for our Creator's sake! Here is the man that not only said what he was going to do but did it. This man is so open about what he's doing he makes sure there are darn near invitations delivered to everyone. How did you feel when 75 or so Congresswomen  stood up at the President's announcement of "Now there are more ladies in Congress than ever before.”?

This man as President has seen to the economic woes of the nation, put more blacks back to work and the country is also enjoying a huge Hispanic Caucus. Let’s deal with this a moment. There are people parading around the halls of both the Senate as well as the house.

However, if you don’t mind from all perceptions this country is looking and behaving like crap. Just look categorically at what this man has done working as our president. In the manner of Security: When Ukraine went nuts during an overly “general-like” figure from the Soviet Union, or Russia, rather than to bow one’s head and let them runabout, as Barack Obama did, President Trump mobilized about 300,000 soldiers plus put an entire flight deck way up for Intel and surveillance. 

When ISIS, you might remember then as The Califate of ISIS, began blowing to bits Iraq, Southern Turkey, where the Kurds live in Northern Iraq and still the deluge of Syria, during his State of the Nation speech he told everyone that our forces had driven them back to no man’s land.

Before I run amuck here do, we all remember when during their retreat ISIS actually moved into Syria – Not just Syria, but where Russia had built a real solid stronghold? I believe it was 51 Hellfire missiles that started to let the world know the USA wasn’t playing anymore.

All this and so much more when the Democrats started playing politics with a much sought-after wall desperately needed on our Southern Border?

What bothers me almost more than anything is that why are we paying Congressional officials? Seems like the only thing they’ve done is to try and reverse the original appropriated funding. This class of new Congressional officials needs to put their heads in the air – look around and get on the winner’s team.

The Crimes Mueller Ignored...

The effort to get rid of Donald Trump is as focused and as intense as it has been since he started running for President. The ongoing silent coup reflects the unhinged hatred for him by the political establishment, all based on one thing, he beat them. He won.

Robert Mueller, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the intelligence community, are working hand-in-hand to destroy Donald Trump. They will not stop. According to Wired, they’ve gained up at least 17 so-called investigations on him. As Bloomberg reports, the left is putting Trump in a “legal vise.”

If they have to destroy his family, his businesses, his lifetime friends and associates, they will. They are pursuing Donald Trump with more fervor and energy than we have seen them pursue terrorists.

Robert Mueller has been tasked to basically find or invent or create any crime he wants. You see, they don’t have to find a crime. They just have to say they did. They don’t have to find an impeachable offense, they just have to say they have.

We believe that the main mission of these anti-Trump investigations is to cover up the malfeasance of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. Tomorrow, I will be writing about these investigations under the column of “The Sampling of the Real Crimes Mueller ignored.”

Time to Read, Listen, and Learn...

Time to Read, Listen, and Learn...       

In today's article it is written with the styled conversation that most readers say they want; furthermore, if anyone out there is paralyzed or handicapped in any other way, please assist the reader with the full meaning of the words chosen by me, and finally, maybe it is just me, but no, I think that this story is far to contemplative for anyone to not learn using the examples I have used. So, let’s get started.

I have stated that for twenty-five year or closer to thirty-years now that I have been writing about matters concerning immigration and even more about illegal immigration. This challenging exercise is definitely prior to the turn of the century insofar as I had been working on a book titled, The Enemy Within saving America from the liberal assault on our Schools, Faith, and Military.

As good and adequate as my book was, I did find a magnificent man named Michael Savage who had already finished his project and it was getting ready for sale; however, there was enough difference in enough areas for me to delve deeper into my own property which has just been released by AuthorSolutions, Inc., titled, An Open Autopsy on America, that I suggest and recommend to every reader that wants to be brought up to date of the onslaught being induced on America some of which is done by our very politicians and business people.

I grew up in Southern California about 50 to 65 miles to the border. It didn’t take long, but I have vivid memories of attending the drive-ins on Friday nights with my parents. Just as soon as we reached all the way up front, directly beneath the drive in’s screen that all hades broke out. Primarily, was the sand portion going to be used as a football or soccer field?

I am now going to ask a question the same question that appears in books, periodicals, international newspapers, and sincerely every form of journalism and electronic media for well over fifty years now. What in our Creator’s name has people from other nations began to caravan to our southern border?

Why in our Creator’s name do we have anywhere between 30 and 50 million undocumented or illegal immigrants living happily, making a lot of money, given access to healthcare at very little if any cost?

Now, let’s look at the daily living. Why has reasonable treatment caused people of other nations to sojourn to our border seeking asylum? In some cases, we have the entirety of Boards of Education failing miserably with emphasis on sciences, technologies, engineering, and math, (STEM) and other areas?

This is my point: Doesn’t anyone find this open-border miss-procedure just a little bit frustrating? Gawd knows that we have in America the most giving, laid back, empowering, and emboldening living accommodations and arrangements in the world.

It has gotten to the point whilst working with Numbers USA and several other advocacy groups that after the vote of 2007 (defeating DREAM Act), 2009 (defeating in-state tuition) to illegals; and again, AND THIS ONE IS FROM YOUR WHITE HOUSE – 2011 (defeating DACA and DAPA) with them getting their engagement proceedings by Executive Order only based on what eight (8) Senators and President Obama wanted?

A look at a Charter School owned by

La Raza.

Well, of course now the entire matter has gotten to the point of unreliable; I do not wish that my country, yeah, the same one I went to war over, is allowing so many people in.

I have let my comments be made known almost everywhere and they remain the same: No Amnesty, No DACA or DAPA, No come and work, get E-Verify up and going, collect the funding due to companies that don’t check, and if you there in WASHINGTON D.C. don’t mind, you and only you should be held responsible, Rep. Nancy Pelosi should be held behind bars and Senator Chuck Schumer ought to be jailed as well – for simply stealing from the American people.

Now is that time!

Now is that time!

I get so sick and tired of hearing people complaining, dreadfully, about our poor immigration system. Fact is, there’s nothing poor about it – unless we are able to count those who allegedly are “at work” on it.

Take a moment and think about it. The United States United States Citizenship and Immigration Services this is the big one. Then, of course, we have U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This is the primary agency with over 450,000 workers that the Democrats want to get rid of.

National Immigration Agency similar name but different working arrangements. 

Immigration and Naturalization Service individual states, regulated immigration into the United States, and the Immigration Act of 1891 established a Commissioner of Immigration in the Treasury Department. May I add that there isn’t one of the 50 or so agencies that are doing a bit of good.

28 December 2018  UK Border Agency superseded by UK Visas and Immigration, UK Border Force and Immigration Enforcement in April 2013. It was formed as an executive agency on 1 April 2008 by executive order.

And who said Ex-president, Barack Obama, didn’t do a thing to stifle immigration? How about the Deferred Action for Childhood Act? Better known as DACA and let’s not forget free admission for their parents with DAPA.

Immigration Enforcement -- Immigration Enforcement (IE) is a division of the Home Office responsible for enforcing immigration law in the United Kingdom. It was established from a Border Force (section Immigration powers).

UK Visas and Immigration visa system and the other for immigration enforcement. The responsible minister is the Minister of State for Immigration. Sarah Rapson, the Registrar General, does this make any difference?

List of national border guard agencies: This is the list of the Border Guard agencies in different countries. Such agencies may also be known as Border Patrol, Border Police, Border Troops, Frontier

Immigration to the United States works within the U.S. immigration system. With immigration enforcement reaching all levels of enforcement agencies, the Immigration Industrial Complex.

Border and Immigration Agency, Immigration and Nationality Directorate and deportation of immigration offenders. The Immigration and Nationality Directorate was replaced by the Border and Immigration Agency on 1 April 2007, heck, don’t ask me why the people who set this rubbish up makes them feel as though they are working.

I want desperately to say that everyone deserves a chance to visit and come to the U.S. However, I do think that the individuals' prior criminal record has a unique standing in whether or not they are given the chance. Seriously now, if a person has been deported out of the nation once, then they should lose the privilege of ever trying again.

So where do we stand with all this craziness? I do not think it’s fair to have Rep. Nancy Pelosi to

even be granted a vote in the matter. All up --- I believe that this is where there are many non-governmental people needed to take over the situation. WHY?

Because for well over one hundred years these “colleagues” in the house and senate have demonstrated how unworthy they really are.

Why swear to give the administration money, then when it comes at issue, these people are actually looking for a compromise. Don’t compromise with anything EXCEPT for closing up loopholes already in place.

Your Rights = Responsibilty and Good Conscience

We have been utterly dying to write this article for who knows how long now. The thesis of this article is the rights we have as Americans that are based within our U.S. Constitution and primarily addressing the Bill of Rights. A couple of years ago whilst reading Original Meanings by Jack N. Rakove he mentions what the Founders felt about human rights transcending into civil rights; yet, it was with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison’s assistance that led to the most common sense ideals that can be found before, during, and after one executes their rights.

Make no mistake about it folks – the entire U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are ‘documents of contract’ that ensure security between a government and those it governs. The rights espoused in the Bill of Rights were written as a measure to protect us from the abuses of power that a government can wield. Yet, just like anything worth having there is a price to be paid to ensure that those rights are not abused, changed, or too legalistic. This is of course the accountability of a collective society to perform its duties which in earlier times consisted of maintaining the core values, morals, and ethics that America was founded upon.

No matter how one perceives themselves, with all the prominence the world could offer, liberties without conscience are inexcusable. In other words, if one intends on speaking freely—this means that upon engaging to speak one must do so with conscience.

Thomas Jefferson left a profound impression upon the nation he loved so much. However, we believe that Jefferson’s greatest effect on this country are not in his inventions, establishments, or politics – we believe that Jefferson’s greatest influence on our nation is in the notion of “Liberties without conscience are inexcusable.”

Now let’s look to practical application aided by a few issues recently in the news: When Bill O’Reilly appeared on The View television show for an interview he was asked “Is it right or wrong for them to want to build a mosque and cultural center here? O’Reilly responded: “I think that it’s inappropriate.” Behar and Goldberg certainly had a different agenda on their minds and prompted O’Reilly with “why is it inappropriate for them to build there”? O’Reilly responded with because they killed…in an act of war…they killed thousands of Americans.” Who are they? The Muslims, of course. Brouhaha ensued.

Immediately O’Reilly realized what he’s said and changed his wording to “Extremist Islamic Terrorists.” This is when Elizabeth Hasselback chimed in with the skill of an orator: “Don’t you see how all of us are suffering at the hands of ‘political correctness’?”

And Mrs. Hasselback was 100 percent correct as was Mr. O’Reilly. You see it’s the dismantling of language that is the very core reason for political correctness. So the saying goes; “All Muslims are not terrorists…but the terrorists were all Muslims.” So naturally when O’Reilly stated Muslims he was immediately pounced on by those who had set this entire issue up.

Furthermore we believe that the Park 51 - Cultural Center and Mosque being built in the current location are an abuse of speech rendered with reckless disregard of conscience and responsibility, not to mention maintaining the core values, morals, and ethics that America was founded upon.

Appeal filed in photographer's case by ADF

As usual we were going about our business soaring through various and sundry informative websites and blogs when S-L-A-P! It feels as though someone has just blazed a flat, wet-hand across your face on a freezing cold winter's day. Know the feeling?

In this particular matter we were doing our level best to research where the Elaine Huguenin case sits as far as appeals, and your general special interest trying to watch out for one of the gravest travesties of the 21st century. For those who don't recall a quick, very quick refresher: (Also, please click here.)

A professional photographer who refused to take pictures of a gay couple’s commitment ceremony because of her religious beliefs violated New Mexico discrimination law, a human rights panel ruled. Vanessa Willock filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission in 2006, contending that Albuquerque photographer Elaine Huguenin told her she photographed only traditional marriages. Huguenin and her husband, Jon, own Elane Photography.

Shortly thereafter Elaine and Jon Huguenin were being sued by Vanessa Willock in front of the New Mexico Human Rights Commission for discrimination based on 'sexual orientation.' What? Yep that's right; it's ugly, it's wrong, it's immoral, lacks any kind of integrity and is void of any humane dignity.

During our search we went back over the particulars and much to our amazement we ran across this quote below by the Alliance Defense Fund's Senior Counsel, Kevin Theriot, that simply stuck out so conspicuously -- "...thoughts, beliefs, and emotions they have that are not considered to be 'politically correct.'" (Must read so click here.)

"All violent crimes are hate crimes, and all crime victims deserve equal justice," ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot explains. "So-called 'hate crime' laws actually serve only one purpose: The criminalization of citizens based on whatever thoughts, beliefs, and emotions they have that are not considered to be 'politically correct.' No one should fall for the idea that this bill does anything to bring about greater justice for Americans."

As mentioned in previous writings – please see the tab marked Political Correctness on the Home page of The Thinker – especially where linguists, academians, and other scholars believe that the quickest way to defragment or disrupt and change a society is by changing its language which is believed is the major culprit behind being politically correct. Just a few examples: "Undocumented worker," a "Blank – American" (hyphenated) and "handicapped to disabled" for a few examples.

Just for the record we like to inform everyone who reads this article or anything whatsoever about this case (Willock v. Elane Photography) that of the first part: Same-sex marriage or commitment ceremonies or civil unions -- anything to do with the union of same-sex partners is illegal in New Mexico. Notice how decietful and scheming Willock was when she went to the New Mexico Human Rights Commission to bring suit. We are of the opinion that if an 'act' is deemed illegal in a state then anything to do with that act would likewise be illegal.

Some of what others' have said...

Simple curiosity inspires me to wonder when the ‘Bar of Standards’ began being lowered. As you know we started writing about this notion of declining standards from day one. We began with standards in the classroom and education and as a result we went further into the family.

Actually there had been so much talk about ‘teaching to the test’ by those who knew nothing about a State’s Standards of Learning that we felt that before parents began participating in the ‘rumor-mill’ they should at least know something about how these standards are manipulated.

And as we continued, readership widened as did participation by just about everyone who read what we had been writing; moreover, our readership began contributing all sorts of wonderful material. In particular, one reader sent us a letter written by Theodore Roosevelt addressing immigration and assimiliation.

“In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…

There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

…Theodore Roosevelt, 1919

Somehow when President Theodore Roosevelt originally stated this I believe he was politically correct; what do you think?