The latest from the Democrat Party in the House...

The latest from the Democrat Party in the House...

U.S. House Democrats passed a sweeping anti-corruption and voting rights bill Friday that they said was intended to make voting easier, as well as strengthen ethics rules, while also rejecting a motion to condemn voting by undocumented immigrants.

Please, let’s look at the structure of the language, if only for the moment. Anti-corruption by voting to allow non-citizens to vote sounds very anti-Constitutional to me. For years the Democrats have been pushing this voting easier idea by suggesting public transportation and transport from door-to-door service. Moreover, they have continued to press for a “voting card” act.

Now then, if you were desirous of condemning the means to strengthen ethics rules, then I would suggest, stop allowing the thousands of illegal immigrants turning to undocumented paperwork for identity measures at the ballot box! Each voting precinct reports “troubles” with virtually unknowns or those people who legitimately cannot prove whether they are citizens or not. And each report is evaluated by the state, but this is a condition that is running perpetually.

Just a thought...to start the week. Is it me, or, is it an entire party that creates a problem for itself that plagues it for years? Quite openly, the Dems want the US to be like a banana republic. Someone with a brain explains to me how can one call for ethics rules and anti-corruption changes and still put up an iron wall when it comes to a national security wall? How could former President Barack Obama sign an executive order after executive order making it available for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), and then DAPA?

All one really needs to do is to look at the last months of Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her army of angry young zealots are the product of us allowing leftist educators to confiscate the hearts and minds of our kids. Just reading about her education policies, abortion madness, and other matters can really carry a party to the extreme Left.  And if I may, history alone tells me that Vietnam had a Democratic third world overture involved.

Wake Up America...Let's Work Together!

Please don’t misunderstand simple politics with political systems. In the realm of “Pop Culture” today, the facts and the immediate change of capitalism versus socialism appears to me the most uneducated information going around.

Now, we place these incredible misnomers up to a wall for national security which is more than necessary and in our other instance of the problems that are being faced in the educational offices around the nation (see Chicago, Baltimore, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties). Let’s plain face it – Democrats are completely destroying this country by their tactics.

Nothing could be clearer than these headlines from the Western Journal. Trump’s Homeland Security Sec. Reminds Democrats They Funded a Border Wall in the Past, And It Worked.  President Donald Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary stated on Wednesday that she is “confounded” by Democrats’ resistance to building a border wall, given they funded one in the past and it worked.

“We know that you are adamant about that wall, just as much as the president,” Fox News anchor Sandra Smith said to Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen, and then asked, “When you hear Democrats so firmly against that, what are they getting wrong?”

“I’m a little bit confounded by that,” the secretary replied. “The wall works. We have evidence and figures that show that.”

“When the wall went up in Yuma (Arizona) and San Diego, illegal entries went down 95 percent,” Nielsen added. “I must remind the viewers that in 2006, it was a bipartisan approach to securing our country.”

The Trump official was referring to the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which passed both chambers of Congress by large majorities.

The following is a Response written by a reader of the periodical.” “I have worked for U.S. Army

counterdrug for 15 years building the wall. Democrats supplied the funding. All of a sudden, it costs too much, whatever. Desperate Dems need illegal votes to keep them in power, draining taxpayer funds. Do it the right way, or do not do it at all. Bunch of millionaire crooks. Deport. Guess they do not understand what Illegal is. They run on personal feelings above our laws. Dinosaur Democrats are coming.”

Furthermore, having 16-state legislatures wanting to get in on the act by waging a law-suit against President Trump and his administration continues to show what kind of human beings we are surrounded by. Ostensibly, it is the very same states who, when Barack Obama was in office sued on behalf of the “Invasion” clause in the Constitution.

If there are one or more individuals who do not understand that 22 million to 40 million people who have come into our nation illegally this constitutes an invasion! Why the Democrats are being reluctant to secure our border shows as Ann Coulter says, “It is being done to make the USA a third world banana republic.” Anyone disagree?

If it is that you do not like someone...get over it!

   This is the kind of mood I find myself in during the first opening of Education, Immigration, and Pop Culture today. It has become so overwhelmingly noticeable to me since the beginning of the first day of his administration Ah, hell! It has been since he registered his name for the office of the President of the United States. Fitting in with the title, haven't you ever worked for someone you didn't care for at all? Now surely, we've all worked with people that we did not much care about. But what can we do about it?.

Here is a secret between you and me, okay? I thought and felt hourly that Barack H.Obama was the absolute poorest excuse for a "President" I'd ever even heard of. Seriously, for the record, he was an on-time senator, learned his politics at Occidental University in L.A. under the tutelage of his grandparents who were card-carrying members of the Socialist Party of America. I am not going to fiddle my way through his trash, but with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and the total of the Chicago mob helping one out well...

 Straighten up for our Creator's sake! Here is the man that not only said what he was going to do but did it. This man is so open about what he's doing he makes sure there are darn near invitations delivered to everyone. How did you feel when 75 or so Congresswomen  stood up at the President's announcement of "Now there are more ladies in Congress than ever before.”?

This man as President has seen to the economic woes of the nation, put more blacks back to work and the country is also enjoying a huge Hispanic Caucus. Let’s deal with this a moment. There are people parading around the halls of both the Senate as well as the house.

However, if you don’t mind from all perceptions this country is looking and behaving like crap. Just look categorically at what this man has done working as our president. In the manner of Security: When Ukraine went nuts during an overly “general-like” figure from the Soviet Union, or Russia, rather than to bow one’s head and let them runabout, as Barack Obama did, President Trump mobilized about 300,000 soldiers plus put an entire flight deck way up for Intel and surveillance. 

When ISIS, you might remember then as The Califate of ISIS, began blowing to bits Iraq, Southern Turkey, where the Kurds live in Northern Iraq and still the deluge of Syria, during his State of the Nation speech he told everyone that our forces had driven them back to no man’s land.

Before I run amuck here do, we all remember when during their retreat ISIS actually moved into Syria – Not just Syria, but where Russia had built a real solid stronghold? I believe it was 51 Hellfire missiles that started to let the world know the USA wasn’t playing anymore.

All this and so much more when the Democrats started playing politics with a much sought-after wall desperately needed on our Southern Border?

What bothers me almost more than anything is that why are we paying Congressional officials? Seems like the only thing they’ve done is to try and reverse the original appropriated funding. This class of new Congressional officials needs to put their heads in the air – look around and get on the winner’s team.

The Crimes Mueller Ignored...

The effort to get rid of Donald Trump is as focused and as intense as it has been since he started running for President. The ongoing silent coup reflects the unhinged hatred for him by the political establishment, all based on one thing, he beat them. He won.

Robert Mueller, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the intelligence community, are working hand-in-hand to destroy Donald Trump. They will not stop. According to Wired, they’ve gained up at least 17 so-called investigations on him. As Bloomberg reports, the left is putting Trump in a “legal vise.”

If they have to destroy his family, his businesses, his lifetime friends and associates, they will. They are pursuing Donald Trump with more fervor and energy than we have seen them pursue terrorists.

Robert Mueller has been tasked to basically find or invent or create any crime he wants. You see, they don’t have to find a crime. They just have to say they did. They don’t have to find an impeachable offense, they just have to say they have.

We believe that the main mission of these anti-Trump investigations is to cover up the malfeasance of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. Tomorrow, I will be writing about these investigations under the column of “The Sampling of the Real Crimes Mueller ignored.”

Time to Read, Listen, and Learn...

Time to Read, Listen, and Learn...       

In today's article it is written with the styled conversation that most readers say they want; furthermore, if anyone out there is paralyzed or handicapped in any other way, please assist the reader with the full meaning of the words chosen by me, and finally, maybe it is just me, but no, I think that this story is far to contemplative for anyone to not learn using the examples I have used. So, let’s get started.

I have stated that for twenty-five year or closer to thirty-years now that I have been writing about matters concerning immigration and even more about illegal immigration. This challenging exercise is definitely prior to the turn of the century insofar as I had been working on a book titled, The Enemy Within saving America from the liberal assault on our Schools, Faith, and Military.

As good and adequate as my book was, I did find a magnificent man named Michael Savage who had already finished his project and it was getting ready for sale; however, there was enough difference in enough areas for me to delve deeper into my own property which has just been released by AuthorSolutions, Inc., titled, An Open Autopsy on America, that I suggest and recommend to every reader that wants to be brought up to date of the onslaught being induced on America some of which is done by our very politicians and business people.

I grew up in Southern California about 50 to 65 miles to the border. It didn’t take long, but I have vivid memories of attending the drive-ins on Friday nights with my parents. Just as soon as we reached all the way up front, directly beneath the drive in’s screen that all hades broke out. Primarily, was the sand portion going to be used as a football or soccer field?

I am now going to ask a question the same question that appears in books, periodicals, international newspapers, and sincerely every form of journalism and electronic media for well over fifty years now. What in our Creator’s name has people from other nations began to caravan to our southern border?

Why in our Creator’s name do we have anywhere between 30 and 50 million undocumented or illegal immigrants living happily, making a lot of money, given access to healthcare at very little if any cost?

Now, let’s look at the daily living. Why has reasonable treatment caused people of other nations to sojourn to our border seeking asylum? In some cases, we have the entirety of Boards of Education failing miserably with emphasis on sciences, technologies, engineering, and math, (STEM) and other areas?

This is my point: Doesn’t anyone find this open-border miss-procedure just a little bit frustrating? Gawd knows that we have in America the most giving, laid back, empowering, and emboldening living accommodations and arrangements in the world.

It has gotten to the point whilst working with Numbers USA and several other advocacy groups that after the vote of 2007 (defeating DREAM Act), 2009 (defeating in-state tuition) to illegals; and again, AND THIS ONE IS FROM YOUR WHITE HOUSE – 2011 (defeating DACA and DAPA) with them getting their engagement proceedings by Executive Order only based on what eight (8) Senators and President Obama wanted?

A look at a Charter School owned by

La Raza.

Well, of course now the entire matter has gotten to the point of unreliable; I do not wish that my country, yeah, the same one I went to war over, is allowing so many people in.

I have let my comments be made known almost everywhere and they remain the same: No Amnesty, No DACA or DAPA, No come and work, get E-Verify up and going, collect the funding due to companies that don’t check, and if you there in WASHINGTON D.C. don’t mind, you and only you should be held responsible, Rep. Nancy Pelosi should be held behind bars and Senator Chuck Schumer ought to be jailed as well – for simply stealing from the American people.

Now is that time!

Now is that time!

I get so sick and tired of hearing people complaining, dreadfully, about our poor immigration system. Fact is, there’s nothing poor about it – unless we are able to count those who allegedly are “at work” on it.

Take a moment and think about it. The United States United States Citizenship and Immigration Services this is the big one. Then, of course, we have U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This is the primary agency with over 450,000 workers that the Democrats want to get rid of.

National Immigration Agency similar name but different working arrangements. 

Immigration and Naturalization Service individual states, regulated immigration into the United States, and the Immigration Act of 1891 established a Commissioner of Immigration in the Treasury Department. May I add that there isn’t one of the 50 or so agencies that are doing a bit of good.

28 December 2018  UK Border Agency superseded by UK Visas and Immigration, UK Border Force and Immigration Enforcement in April 2013. It was formed as an executive agency on 1 April 2008 by executive order.

And who said Ex-president, Barack Obama, didn’t do a thing to stifle immigration? How about the Deferred Action for Childhood Act? Better known as DACA and let’s not forget free admission for their parents with DAPA.

Immigration Enforcement -- Immigration Enforcement (IE) is a division of the Home Office responsible for enforcing immigration law in the United Kingdom. It was established from a Border Force (section Immigration powers).

UK Visas and Immigration visa system and the other for immigration enforcement. The responsible minister is the Minister of State for Immigration. Sarah Rapson, the Registrar General, does this make any difference?

List of national border guard agencies: This is the list of the Border Guard agencies in different countries. Such agencies may also be known as Border Patrol, Border Police, Border Troops, Frontier

Immigration to the United States works within the U.S. immigration system. With immigration enforcement reaching all levels of enforcement agencies, the Immigration Industrial Complex.

Border and Immigration Agency, Immigration and Nationality Directorate and deportation of immigration offenders. The Immigration and Nationality Directorate was replaced by the Border and Immigration Agency on 1 April 2007, heck, don’t ask me why the people who set this rubbish up makes them feel as though they are working.

I want desperately to say that everyone deserves a chance to visit and come to the U.S. However, I do think that the individuals' prior criminal record has a unique standing in whether or not they are given the chance. Seriously now, if a person has been deported out of the nation once, then they should lose the privilege of ever trying again.

So where do we stand with all this craziness? I do not think it’s fair to have Rep. Nancy Pelosi to

even be granted a vote in the matter. All up --- I believe that this is where there are many non-governmental people needed to take over the situation. WHY?

Because for well over one hundred years these “colleagues” in the house and senate have demonstrated how unworthy they really are.

Why swear to give the administration money, then when it comes at issue, these people are actually looking for a compromise. Don’t compromise with anything EXCEPT for closing up loopholes already in place.

The Birthright Citizenship Act

Some Members of Congress have introduced bills to eliminate birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally or on temporary visas. The “Birthright Citizenship Act” (HR 1868), introduced by Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) has 91 cosponsors. A bill by Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-CA) would restrict birthright citizenship to the children “of a mother who is a citizen or legal permanent resident of the United States.”

Just about everyone who has read the Fourteenth Amendment can clearly see the politicking and potential corruption that could easily be caused by the amendments wording. Yet, we believe one still should see the entirety of the situation at the time of its writing to fully understand how Congressional elected officials could present and rush through a piece of legislation that in all seriousness – no one could be proud of authoring.

As most will admit the U.S. Constitution is more of how the federal government is supposed to limit itself, while producing guidelines on how to ensure safety, protection, laws, courts, and separation of powers within that government. The Constitution is a brilliant document that took a lot of men (and their women) years to produce; however, it was never intended to be scripture or Bible, Torah, or Qur'an like.

So many people revere the Constitution as if it were a holy book or artifact, when in reality it is not. There are clearly some needed changes; however, to get any Congress to do such is out-of-bounds or even reasonable. As we look deeply at the Fourteenth Amendment, hopefully it will become obvious just where changes are needed and why. Therefore, let’s look at some of the issues that the Thirty-ninth Congress had to address much sooner than later.

Of course the matter of Dred Scott v. Sanford needed to be cleaned up before anything else could reasonable get done. In 1857 the Supreme Court had ruled that no black of African descent (even a freed black) could be a citizen of the United States. Furthermore, even prior to the1860s blacks were counted as 3/5ths of a person.

Therefore the Fourteenth Amendment was necessary to over-turn Dred Scott and to settle the question of the citizenship of the newly freed slaves. Now imagine that – need some changes to an unethical law that is antiquated? Congress immediately went to work on it. It must be clearly noted that this was during the Reconstruction Era and the Congress had an enormous amount of matters to settle – especially since the nation had been broken into two parts with separate ideologies on how things were to be managed.

There is a cliché that states: “To the victors go the spoils…” ostensibly meaning if you’ve gone to war and won then you are entitled to take or gather what you want. This was not the case with the United States “Union” government; however, no mistake should be made – over 600,000 men, women, and children died as a direct cause of this war and of course the North wanted some reparations from the South.

If possible think of two separate nations deluxe with governments, legislatures, judiciary, even money designed in your country’s standards. As in all wars the winning side does not want their former enemies to rebuild – especially its war making equipment. Furthermore, think of the South as the agrarian labor intensive providers of the entire nation, who had racked up enormous war debts that they couldn’t pay and for having hundreds of thousands of slaves that instead of being paid for were able to go free. The South had suffered incalculable losses.

The North was bent on what all victors nearly die for – the admission that they had won the war. Moreover, the North wanted various and sundry punishments for those who had left the Union on the State level, Confederate level, including the Confederate president, generals, and other high-ranking men of war.

However, citizenship loomed over those who fought and were not free; Dred Scott needed overturning, and the Fourteenth Amendment needed to be cleared for the forthcoming Civil Rights Act of 1866. (End Part 2)



What is this Sleaze up to now?

When it comes to personal responsibility in this country we must face the simple truth of the matter: it doesn’t exist. We have just a few elements to let our readers know how little you mean to the federal government.

I openly admit that the Freedom of Information Act was that “pie-in-the-sky” legal strategy that so many had worked so hard to get recognized. When you hear the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that is precisely what it means. The American people are entitled to see, handle, copy, everything that has been classified earlier by some ‘sanction’ of the U.S. Federal Government. Had it not been for the dog-fight and pure hustle by a few we sure as Hades would not know many of the things we do today.

For us to read that in Obama’s new Financial Regulations law passed last week provides the Securities and Exchange Commission with a non-disclosure clause and the fall-out should be humongous. Yes, you’ve read that properly. The SEC who allowed Bernie Madoff of Ponzi scheme fame rip-off 60 billion dollars from investors – who used the FOIA to procure the documents to prove Madoff’s crimes – is no longer subject to having to produce any documents of its own. Obama mused:

"[I]... was saying that one of the cornerstones of the sweeping new legislation was more transparent financial markets. Indeed, in touting the new law, Obama specifically said it would “increase transparency in financial dealings."

This is unconscionable. We have become fully aware that this Barack Obama and his machine do not have America, the citizens of America, the American military, or anything that the Founding Fathers worked so tirelessly to frame this person Barack Obama is doing his level best to tear the United States apart and down. Something oozes out of his mouth and before it can show up in print, he’s already gone against everything he said he would do.

We submit to you a walk down memory lane at The Thinker. In just the titles we ask that you can relate to our rage!

How many of us remember the House Banking Scandal? This is preposterous, it must be delusional. This mess has become so huge we better stop it before its too late. Regulation after regulation with incompetence after more incompetence. Second verse, same as the first or is it just "business as usual"?

Political Correctness in the military, part 2

Earlier this month we presented an article that espoused the notion as to whether "political correctness" may have had a direct result on the travesty at Fort Hood. We quite openly believe that if a person is acting out with their ideological beliefs and is conflicted about what he believes as opposed to what he does, sure – there can be a real problem.

However the point of our previous article as well as this one is to illustrate how gaining "protected status" under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment – has reached a point where it simply is not assisting those who need protection in this country. (Please see previous articles by clicking here.)

Sixty-three percent (63%) of U.S. voters say political correctness prevented the military from responding to warning signs from Major Nidal Malik Hasan that could have prevented the Fort Hood shootings from taking place.

A new Rasmussen Reports national survey shows that just 16% disagree and do not believe political correctness kept military authorities from possibly stopping the killing of 13 people and the wounding of many others in the November 5 incident. Twenty-one percent (21%) are not sure.

Older Americans are more suspicious of political correctness than voters under 40. Republicans and voters not affiliated with either major political party overwhelmingly believe political correctness held the military back. That view is shared by 49% of Democrats while 23% of those in the president’s party disagree to think political correctness kept the military from responding to warning signs from Hasan.

Seventy-five percent (75%) of Mainstream Americans think political correctness prevented the military from responding before the attacks took place.

New reports say authorities were aware of suspicious behavior and comments by Hasan, a devout Muslim, but no action was taken against him, in part because of concern that there might be an appearance of anti-Islamic bias. Both President Obama and the Army chief of staff urged Americans not to jump to conclusions about the cause of the shootings just after they took place.

Seventy-three percent (73%) of Texas voters say Hasan should receive the death penalty if he is convicted of the massacre at Fort Hood. Military prosecutors have charged Hasan with 13 counts of premeditated murder. If convicted, he is eligible for the death penalty. Quick question: Why do you suppose that voters over the age of 40 are more suspicious of political correctness?

America: What is your government up too?

We heard it live today in an interview with Sen. Orin Hatch (R-UT) the unadulterated statement that we've been waiting for from someone on the Hill. During his interview with Bill Hemmer of FOX News' America's Newsroom, Sen. Hatch constantly referred to initiatives that ostensibly got the health care bill passed in the House of Representatives; however, before even addressing as to whether or not the Senate will debate the issue, Sen. Hatch made mention of those two-biggest lies that he – as well as his colleagues – sincerely hope will not be messed with.

The two issues are health care for illegal aliens and federally funded abortions. While in the process of closing the interview, Mr. Hatch stated: "I hope the American people revolt." And we are at the point of total agreement with Sen. Hatch.

Ladies and gentlemen all one needs to do is look at the language, moreover the lies that are being told everyday albeit from the White House, Department of Justice, Nan Pelosi and 'her health care bill' and the other inside the beltway corrupt-o-crats.

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops:

In order to get the health care bill passed through Nan Pelosi's House, more than 25 Democrat representatives had to be reassured that federally funded abortion was a big fat NO! For weeks, the Catholic Church has asked its U.S. parishioners to work toward ensuring that tough language restricting federal funding of abortion is included in healthcare overhaul legislation.

But as the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the church's governing body in America, tries to rally its forces outside Congress, it is also using its leverage within.

It used that influence this month as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the healthcare legislation. Negotiators for the church worked with lawmakers to add an amendment to ensure that federal insurance subsidies do not wind up funding elective abortion. Doesn't it seem that the "Almighty Clause" found nowhere in the Constitution, 'Separation between church and state' is a convenient colloquialism when one wants to gain from it?

AG Eric Holder up to 'Old tricks'

Do yourselves a remarkable favor and drop by Michelle Malkin's blog immediately! In her lead story she addresses some rather significant conflicts of interests vis-a-vie Team Obama and starring Attorney General Eric Holder and many, many members of the Culture of Corruption. Michelle has actually included an excerpt from her best-selling masterpiece which bears the same name. This is must reading! Get a grip on what is really going on in America's government.

Appeal filed in photographer's case by ADF

As usual we were going about our business soaring through various and sundry informative websites and blogs when S-L-A-P! It feels as though someone has just blazed a flat, wet-hand across your face on a freezing cold winter's day. Know the feeling?

In this particular matter we were doing our level best to research where the Elaine Huguenin case sits as far as appeals, and your general special interest trying to watch out for one of the gravest travesties of the 21st century. For those who don't recall a quick, very quick refresher: (Also, please click here.)

A professional photographer who refused to take pictures of a gay couple’s commitment ceremony because of her religious beliefs violated New Mexico discrimination law, a human rights panel ruled. Vanessa Willock filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission in 2006, contending that Albuquerque photographer Elaine Huguenin told her she photographed only traditional marriages. Huguenin and her husband, Jon, own Elane Photography.

Shortly thereafter Elaine and Jon Huguenin were being sued by Vanessa Willock in front of the New Mexico Human Rights Commission for discrimination based on 'sexual orientation.' What? Yep that's right; it's ugly, it's wrong, it's immoral, lacks any kind of integrity and is void of any humane dignity.

During our search we went back over the particulars and much to our amazement we ran across this quote below by the Alliance Defense Fund's Senior Counsel, Kevin Theriot, that simply stuck out so conspicuously -- "...thoughts, beliefs, and emotions they have that are not considered to be 'politically correct.'" (Must read so click here.)

"All violent crimes are hate crimes, and all crime victims deserve equal justice," ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot explains. "So-called 'hate crime' laws actually serve only one purpose: The criminalization of citizens based on whatever thoughts, beliefs, and emotions they have that are not considered to be 'politically correct.' No one should fall for the idea that this bill does anything to bring about greater justice for Americans."

As mentioned in previous writings – please see the tab marked Political Correctness on the Home page of The Thinker – especially where linguists, academians, and other scholars believe that the quickest way to defragment or disrupt and change a society is by changing its language which is believed is the major culprit behind being politically correct. Just a few examples: "Undocumented worker," a "Blank – American" (hyphenated) and "handicapped to disabled" for a few examples.

Just for the record we like to inform everyone who reads this article or anything whatsoever about this case (Willock v. Elane Photography) that of the first part: Same-sex marriage or commitment ceremonies or civil unions -- anything to do with the union of same-sex partners is illegal in New Mexico. Notice how decietful and scheming Willock was when she went to the New Mexico Human Rights Commission to bring suit. We are of the opinion that if an 'act' is deemed illegal in a state then anything to do with that act would likewise be illegal.

Law Enforcement Working Together....what a concept!

     Have we entered into a time where -- finally – the various law enforcement agencies have begun to work together? What a concept! Now what will Hollyweird writers have to write about? For too long its major mess-ups because the FBI didn't want anyone in their jurisdiction, while the local police and sheriffs' departments who'd worked the crimes wanted some credit and there's nothing wrong with that. Please everyone who has ears listen! With the recent apprehension and foiled terrorist attacks in New York, Colorado, and Canada that we know about – where the CIA worked with the ATF who worked with ICE who worked with the FBI who worked with the NYPD and other agencies – nothing shy of marvelous.

    However we want to espouse that at a time when ALL the local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies are working together for the first time wouldn't you know it, some 500 special interest groups are raising Cain for some violation of some illegal immigrants rights albeit they are here illegally.

As such, we at American Age feel it is incumbent upon us to get the word out about all matters concerning immigration reform. Therefore, in our steadfast heart of hearts, we believe beyond question that there are hundreds; if not thousands of special interest/advocacy groups that have already set in motion their own 'version' of what immigration reform will look like. And folks as far as we're concerned we don't like the looks of it; moreover, we dislike and disrespect the notion that terms and conditions of illegal immigration will be dictated to us.

From the Los Angeles Times:

500 groups urge Obama to halt immigration police program

A letter to the president says local enforcement of federal immigration laws has led to racial profiling and civil rights violations.

A coalition of advocacy groups sent a letter to President Obama last week demanding that the administration end a program that allows local police to enforce federal immigration law.

The program, known as 287(g), deputizes police to turn over suspects or criminals to immigration authorities for possible deportation. Immigrant rights groups said the program has led to civil rights violations and racial profiling.

"Racial profiling and other civil rights abuses by the local law enforcement agencies that have sought out 287(g) powers have compromised public safety, while doing nothing to solve the immigration crisis," the letter states. "The program has worked counter to community policing goals by eroding the trust and cooperation of immigrant communities and diverted already reduced law enforcement resources from their core mission."

Who, what, where, why, and how do these advocacy groups – who receive funding from the U.S. government – think they are insofar as demanding things? Moreover, in our humble opinion one of the greatest difficulties facing a uniform cross-agency program – involving local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies – is that there are restrictions that any one of these agencies can't do in order to perform to the best of their abilities and with each other.

We say nonsense to this garbage! Furthermore, all of these special interest groups should be well-advised that there are consequences for their actions – if and only if we have the government that will enforce our Nation's "Manner of Laws." (Further reading click here.)

Justice department 'empowering' illegal immigrants

The U.S. Department of Justice has given a public university a special grant to help illegal immigrants in the Midwest and teach their employers, primarily in the meatpacking and construction industries, how to curb discrimination against foreign-born workers. (One step closer to 'protected status'.)

Indeed, the government agency charged with defending the nation's interests and enforcing the law is helping those who have violated it. The Justice Department is supposed to ensure public safety against foreign and domestic threats and seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior not reward them. (Seriously, how many of us knew this was going on?)

Instead, the agency has given the University of Iowa a $50,000 grant to help empower the illegal immigrant labor force that, according to a press release, substantially benefits significant Midwestern industries. The taxpayer money went to the school’s Center for Human Rights, which plans to stop the exploitation of immigrant workers who are too often vulnerable to discrimination and unsafe working conditions. (Rather than 'empower' why aren't they spending the money on deportation?)

Among other things, the school will use the cash to extend significant outreach activities to immigrant workforces in Iowa and Nebraska and provide educational opportunities to the business community relating to immigration law and the rights of foreign-born workers. Industries notorious for hiring illegal aliens, such as meatpacking and construction, will be heavily targeted.

The Justice Department has a history of protecting illegal immigrants and accommodating them in exchange for their testimony in the criminal prosecutions of U.S. law enforcement officers. The agency recently brought deported illegal aliens back to the U.S. to testify against an Arizona sheriff who enforces immigration law through a federal partnership.

A few years ago, Justice Department officials actually went into Mexico to give a drug dealer immunity to testify against two veteran Border Patrol agents who intercepted his U.S.-bound vehicle loaded with 743 pounds of marijuana. The admitted Mexican drug smuggler got shot trying to evade the federal officers and the Justice Department prosecuted both of them. Incredibly, the agents got convicted of causing serious bodily injury, assault with a deadly weapon, discharge of a firearm and violating the drug smuggler’s civil rights.

What is going on in this nation of ours when the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi D-CA, uses the United States Air Force as her private fleet of jets; or Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner admittedly cheated on his income taxes to the amount of say, $25,000; least we never forget Mr. William Jefferson D-LA who was caught red-handed on video tape being given $100,000 grand, and in possession of $90,000 tucked neatly in the freezer of his Louisiana home.

Please ladies and gentlemen let's do the right thing and demand that Eric Holder, Attorney General of the US, put an end to this grave travesty. Thank you.

Immigration reform, part 2

We left off previously with the offer of illegal immigrants making a declaration of good faith in such a way as to immediately go to the nearest Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency or through any of the agencies of immigration services and registering pursuant to their status. Doing this would assure them the proper identification for anything they would like to do.

With the perspective of knowing who is here in America, this 'registration process' is really part of the actual U.S. Census insofar as it will allow for the proper budgeting, personnel, and infrastructure to support the unexpected rise in costs.

Just a sidebar for those who are preparing to scream Political Correctness and the entire notion of 'undocumented immigrants, immigrant's human and civil rights,' and everything else under the sun, be advised that treating this illegal status as anything but what it honestly is – illegal is to defecate on America's founding documents; moreover, crush a nation that used to pride itself in the "Manner of Law."

We certainly have no problem with immigration; albeit, when it is done in controlled fashion as it is designed. Make no mistake about it, we – every single citizen of the United States – with a reasonable mind knows that this country was built and maintained by immigrants.

Yet our question remains the same; namely, is coming in hoards – illegally – the proper way of achieving the end result of prosperity? We feel the frustration of those others' who are somehow stymied in a quagmire of bureaucratic malfunction at no fault of their own. Should the law abiding person in Europe, Asia or South America be forced to wait ten or more years because untold millions have recklessly disregarded proper procedures and placed undo strain on legal immigration?

Illegal Immigration should cease immediately
I have become convinced that the safety of our institutions, the continuity of our prosperity, the preservation of our standards of living, and the maintaining of a decent level of morals among us depends upon a most rigid limitation of immigration and the maintaining of a rigid standard as to even those few who may be admitted...Albert Johnson, The Alien in Our Midst,1930.

The real victims of illegal immigration are basically in two groups. The first is the working poor Americans. When illegals cross the borders and begin to work most employers find themselves in a position to be unscrupulous by paying less than minimum wage. When wages are driven down as well as unemployment taxes, health insurance, and whatever else the government wants to take, this scenario does in fact place burdens on those other industries, thus causing an over-burden on public assistance.

We are convinced that the new minimum wage levels are better than they were; however, if employers can hire someone who will work for lower than minimum it no longer becomes effective for the American worker to consider those wages; we are convinced that this is what is meant by "taking jobs from Americans" as well as "we do the jobs that Americans don't want too..."

Briefly until later or even tomorrow, when one considers that illegal immigrants send approximately 65% of their earned wages back to their home countries what have we to say about the free market system? Moreover, with respect to the Federal Reserve, the figures we're addressing is somewhere near $20 billion dollars per year.

Therefore, as a second measure of immigration reform we suggest that there be some type of internal controls put on the Federal Reserves to monitor the funds going out of the country, albeit in cash stuff envelops or multi-family transfers.