Thursday, February 14, 2019

Congress steamed toward lopsided approval

Congress steamed toward lopsided approval

Congress steamed toward lopsided approval of a border security compromise Thursday night that would avert a second painful government shutdown but ignite a major new confrontation — this time over President Donald Trump's plan to bypass lawmakers and declare a national emergency to siphon billions from other federal coffers for his wall on the Mexican boundary. Wall money in the bill, about $1.4 billion, is far below the $5.7 billion Trump has insisted he must have. The White House said he'd sign the legislation but then act on his own to get the rest, a move is sure to bring immediate efforts in court and elsewhere to block him.

Let’s look at what’s happened here. Being as open and honest as I can be, I cringe whenever I see something written like, “toward a lopsided approval.” Whenever anything is lopsided it tells me that there is something that people want – yet, still not received; moreover, it also alerts me to the notion that there is something else planned by those who overwhelmingly lopsided this bill.

And from the opening statement, many of these are revealed. Other plans not listed are those that have to do with particians, or the balance of gerrymandering currently being held by Democrat voters being drawn over again, as well as, giving other politicians a say in whether or not a barrier or wall could be built at all.

I believe that we those inhabiting the USA, are in and have been involved in this national emergency since the 1960s and full scale since the daunting of Senator Edward Kennedy got involved during the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act. Why a national emergency?

The US is a sovereign nation. This is how we are identified in the World Court and with the United Nations. Plainly, and this is indeed what the Democratic Party plays upon during their snarly ways with political correctness.

In other words, a nation cannot be sovereign whilst not having borders. Since the earliest days of my educational training (as a student) we stood as we “Pledged our Allegiance” to our nation. When in middle school, they designed a modified classroom period for this various pledge, for other matters as well such as attendance, and to inform the students of dances and other information. Oh yeah, they called it homeroom back then and it went on to K-12.

But more than anything I have been writing my Congressional districts Representative and the two Senators of my state monthly for 11 years now – with concerns of the invasion, terrorist training, and the ease by which former administrations have allowed 22-40 million people from one country alone to come to America.  Just to add to our invasion of people from everywhere asylum-seeking, in other words, to gain “protected status” look at the caravans that are already in the process starting in South America, every nation in Central America are cheating out other Europeans and deserving Asians by creating the quagmire at the southern border.

What do you think happened when the Obama administration’s final count of people from Africa
arrived? One of Barack Obama’s aunts from Kenya, and one of his uncles also from Kenya both in and out of rehab, and both in trouble with USICE and the law. Are these the kind of people you want in your community?

As a shocker to me were the “landmines” that the Democrats attached to this bill. One shocker is in the notion that local politicians, (Mayors, State office holders, heck maybe even those on the towns district council will have a vote.) What I am trying to explain is what the President needs and what he was guaranteed by the Democrats now is far less and they want locals prescribing international law. No doubt these county-council people own land in these areas.

Therefore, as my distinct word to you, I’ll look it up.


No comments: